Who is Enrique Tarrio?
Henry “Enrique” Tarrio, 36, of Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida, United States was one of the leaders of the Proud Boys, which Gavin McInnes founded in September 2016, and Latinos for Trump, which was formed in Florida in June 2019.
On December 12, 2020, Tarrio and other Proud Boys members scaled the fence of the Metropolitan African Methodist Episcopal Church in Washington D.C., USA and tore down a large Black Lives Matter sign on display. On December 30, 2020, cryptocurrency promoter Eryka Gemma Flores sent him a nine-page document that outlined a plan to storm government buildings around the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.
On January 4, 2021, the Metropolitan AME Church filed a lawsuit against Tarrio and the Proud Boys. He was arrested shortly after his arrival in Washington, D.C. that day.
On January 5, 2021, Tarrio appeared in court before D.C. Superior Court Magistrate Judge Renee Raymond. The judge released the Proud Boys leader his own recognizance.
Moreoder, Raymond ordered Tarrio to stay outside Washington, D.C. until his next hearing in June 2021. The latter was charged with destruction of property.
Raised Catholic, Tarrio grew up in Little Havana, Miami. He is Republican and he identifies as Afro-Cuban.
In 2004, Tarrio was convicted of theft, sentenced to community service and three years of probation and ordered to pay restitution. After his conviction, he relocated to a small town in the northern part of Florida to run a poultry farm but later returned to Miami.
CONAN Daily 
What hypocrites..tarrio is of African ancestry period!
LikeLike
🤣
LikeLike
🤣!
LikeLike
It just doesn’t make sense to me! To be the leader of such a group, with a heavy dose of white supremacy, yet he has elekes on??!!
LikeLike
Why are Americans following a Cuban political extremist? This guy is a Loser who has a different Agenda from American citizens
LikeLike
This is a person with deep self hatred and denial about who and what he is. Why does he even call himself Afro Cuban? Or has he been calling himself Cuban lately? To them he’s nothing, but someone they can use.
LikeLike
My comment is awaiting moderation. Your comment will be posted after it has been APPROVED.
INALIENABLE RIGHTS, get it?
LikeLike
A loser on all accounts, only thing keeping him visible is a pretty boy status and petty crime.., A real dick.
LikeLike
My comment to Enrique Tarrio: take time to look in the mirror? How can an Afro-Cuban be a white supremicist? Do you hate yourself that much? Redeem yourself.
LikeLike
stupid moron
LikeLike
Shame on Tarrio!! Cuban, Afro-American, U S citizen a WHITE Supremesist?? Raised in “Little Havana”? Who / what are you?? Taking advantage of his US citizen rights to betray the nation than educated you, gave you Constitutional rights yet you betray your nation of birth!!!Fascist, leave for Cuba after completing your 22 year sentence, & go fight for your Cuba!! We don’t want you here!! Traitor!!
LikeLike
Thank you for the insightful article about Enrique Tarrio’s recent legal issues and the implications for political activists in Washington, D.C. One point that stands out is how legal decisions like this can shape the operational landscape for political groups in the capital. Expanding on this, it’s important to consider how legal mechanisms, such as the writ of mandamus, can affect individuals’ rights and their ability to challenge governmental actions.
The writ can be a critical tool for those feeling wronged by administrative delays, like in immigration cases, where timely resolutions are essential. An example could be how activists might utilize such writing to prompt quicker responses from authorities regarding their rights or access to information. Moreover, drawing parallels to other high-profile cases where individuals have been kept away from certain areas due to legal orders could provide a broader perspective on the unintended consequences of such decisions.
For instance, understanding how these restrictions can foster a narrative around dissent and civic engagement may lead to new strategies among activists advocating for their causes. In light of these thoughts, how do you see the balance between maintaining public order and protecting civil liberties evolving in the current political climate?
LikeLike